several days ... I do not know anything about the hotel gardener, these grasses need to be cut and do not hear the sound of the mower that both relaxes me. I do not want to put up with weeds, that it is growing next to the rather, it is not.
and speaking of grass, I heard someone say on TV that you have to "legalize" some drugs, including marijuana in a kind of stimulant selected to receive what seems an inevitable "pardon." well. but, what a coincidence, the topic comes up often during the election situation just as it will renew the Congress, and then candid candidates, yeah right, come to think and as they know the subject, as so many others, his ravings end up being fine thread for all those media, in this electoral process, do not care more than that, post delusions, about the same you produce some drugs from those who want to "legalize."
and ... just speaking of delusions, the absurdities and outrages comments here I have some lit a candidate who may want to try: see point one. if you want to "legalize" it is because there is a black market, there is demand, there are users. then, benefit or no benefit is called "legalization" of certain drugs to their users? let's put it in practical terms it would be easier to buy. While it is true that access to marijuana is not difficult in most cases, one in five hundred is. you may end up in jail, according to circumstances, depending on location, according to economic status. in that one in five hundred anything can happen. buy it at an approved establishment, not only would reduce the danger and violence, if not further raise the quality. estandarizarían prices because fewer hands would go through the product. In conclusion, increased safety for all users * do not assume that guys? So it must be fish!
but there come forward to say: "That just promote consumption ..."
sorry, a touch ... Menita dime linda (you say. as you know, she always says something intelligent) eh eh, I think that consumption would drop a bit with this "legalization" because it would be regulated as now printed on cigarette packets a photograph of a terminally ill lung cancer, as in the bags of grass, they should be restrictions, consequences and how people get if consumed in excess, how it affects the brain and all that. I think so people I think better "
course she is right. illegality what is promoted on misinformation or information that is most confusing, especially to the younger marihuaneritos, Mena is not it?
ok. the second point. here are several ways to view the situation. in terms of road safety and pedestrian protection that takes the subject itself relevant. for example, with this "legalization" Police raids and could fine or take a driver's license to those who handle or too frilly ruffles. as Mena says, people think better before getting into his 4 x 4 and get a touch of cannabis sativa. not like now, that even to get brutazos taxear. then, with the "legalization" or reduce traffic accidents or more revenue from fines. What do you think?
my friend who is over the police and who studied with me at school, tells me that marijuana consumption is already "legalized" for some time, you can smoke it, you can not do is buy it, buy it. Is not this an Estonian legal?
has this effect of tetrahydro cannabinol. (What do you say my dear Vincent?) Now I listen to Vincent that the "legalization" also would result in investment and employment generation. imagine the weedshops, specially designed spaces for quiet smoke or for a tourist to come and taste the local species, that these places have rooms of music ... food (for exit), art exhibitions, which are a tourist attraction, with ancient Inca concept if you want. and Europe, but better, more mystical. estonazo!
indeed, may even have psychologists and specialists in support for the terminally ill or classes of mathematics, philosophy or just a place where you meet or find people to talk, but very twisty. as it is today STURBUCKS, but with fireplaces.
Anel just arrived (she was a congressman in another life) is friends with Lucia the theater, they are both users and consume daily. she says that "legalization" would see on TV, making culinary programs, "the adventure of maricucha" holy herb including the protagonist of his dishes as he says Acurio ... uhm!
then, should be legalized or not? The only bad thing I see in all this is that like any business, the grass will become a commodity, in these products that only handles a large group and that group controls all, as with fuel, as with wheat, sugar , say something closer. hallucinate that in the future and I think ah ... For example, in a new government of Alan and the grass "certified" totally ... I see them queuing to buy low-quality marijuana with sick pit and what is worse, without any guarantee and certainty that tomorrow you will find. no, not that!
gentlemen, you, the parliament of lettuce, half promoters of ideas, if they want to "legalize" this little green leaf, this gift of nature, have to regulate the subject well, with a clear law, intended not only for technical The views of users should be considered or yes (Hart focus group) and from and I tell them I've been listening to several users who say it is better to not legalize, that's right, is not Lucy?
if so ... the gardener has to appear!
is important to note that in Peru, the number of users grows every day. more and more young people who smoke. in Holland the release of soft drugs like marijuana, has reached just over three decades and the local consumption balance yields a considerable decrease. tourism consumption is what keeps these local landmarks, such spaces francs at the time helped to segment selling drugs, not mixing the soft with hard.
SOUNDTRACK OF THIS TEXT:
STONES - SONIC NURSE / SONIC YOUTH
DAMAGED GOODS - DAMAGED GOODS EP / GANG OF FOUR
0 comments:
Post a Comment